Back

McWorld

The market imperative

Quest for markets pushes against national boundaries

Gives rise to multinational corporations (Coke), international trade organizations (GATT), Transnational lobbying groups (OPEC or Greenpeace)

Reinforces the quest for peace and stability

Common markets demand common language, currency and common behaviors

Eastern European revolutions (fight for freedom or Big Macs)

The resource imperative

Not every country had good soil, lots of minerals

Every nations needs something another nation has

Some nations have almost nothing they need

The information-technology imperative

Science is a search for universal solutions + and embrace of objectivity and impartiality

Science depends on open discourse and exchange of information

Banking and commerce all depend on information flow and new communication technologies

Individual cultures speak different languages

Commerce and science increasingly speak English

The whole word speaks binary code

Pursuit of society forces open societies – faxes, modems, satellite dishes don’t know borders

Entertainment can reach even farther (through the 1980s in South Africa the most popular show was The Cosby Show)

Entertainment culture has become more important than armaments

McDonald’s in Moscow will do more to create a global culture than will military colonization

The ecological imperative

Ecology is global

German forests can be destroyed by Swiss and Italians driving leaded gasoline cars

Brazilian farmers burning the Amazon could affect greenhouse gasses

A mill shutting down here, means a mill somewhere else opens

 

So what does McWorld mean?

McWorld tries to create a peaceful, prosperity and unity – breakdown of national power

Homogenized and depolitisized

(how few young people vote)

Lends itself to surveillance as well as liberty

New kinds of participation as well as new forms of manipualtion

Greater productivity as well as skewed, unjust market outcomes

No guarantee of democracy -- Diminishes community, independence and identity

Closes down public policy options (being able to buy 100s of car models deprives the options of mass transit)

Sees people not as citizens but as consumers

Social justice and equality only needed so far as to produce efficient producers and consumers

In trading partners, predictability is of more value than justice

 

Jihad

Forces against uniformity and integration (religious- Islamic fundamentalists, ethnic- hutus and tutsis, cultural- French)

Very destabilizing as war becomes a instrument of identity and expression of community (former yugoslavia)

A quest for ever smaller community

A breakdown of civility in the name of identity

 

So what does Jihad mean?

Vibrant local identity, sense of community, solidarity with people like you – breakdown of national power

Founded on exclusion

Solidarity often means obedience, fanaticism and the obliteration of the individual

Clearly not very democratic

May be the last sigh before the eternal yawn of McWorld

 

Is Barber correct?

James Poniewozik, editor of Salon.com,  argues “no” in “Fallen Arches”

Refers to Barber and New York Times’ Thomas Friedman

Friedman argued that “no 2 coutries that both had McDonald’s have ever fought a war against each other”

When a country has a big enough middle class to support a McDonald’s it starts having roughly that same vested interests as other McDonald’s nations

(then of course NATO started bombing Belgrade which has numerous McDonalds)

Or consider the boy in a Chicago Bulls baseball cap dancing on the wing of a downed NATO jet

So in Yugoslavia we see both ethnic hatred and commodity culture seemingly existing side by side